Iddah Belief Demands that are not Under The Husband's Capability in Palangka Raya City

Authors

  • Hidayati Taruna Huda Faculty of Sharia, State Islamic Institute Palangka Raya
  • Abdul Helim Faculty of Sharia, State Islamic Institute Palangka Raya
  • Muhammad Norhadi Faculty of Sharia, State Islamic Institute Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23971/mirah.v1i1.249

Keywords:

Demands, Abilities, Idah Living.

Abstract

This research was motivated by a case that the researcher found in the wife’s application for idah maintenance, she did not ask for the amount of idah maintenance voluntarily but rather requested idah maintenance which burdened the husband. Therefore, this study focuses on why wives demand an income not by their husband’s abilities in Palangka Raya and how the husband’s attitude responds to the wife’s demands for an income that does not follow his abilities in Palangka Raya. The qualitative method used in this research uses empirical legal research with a sociological juridical type, with a socio- legal approach. The research results show: 1. The exwife demands a living that is not following the ex-husband’s capabilities in Palangka Raya,according to the theory of responsibility. The ex-husband has fulfilled his obligations. Benefits occur from providing idah maintenance according to the ex-husband’s capabilities as stipulated in the decision. 2. Ex-husbands in Palangka Raya respond to their wives’ demands regarding income with honesty and openness. The ex-husband showed a social attitude by promising to pay part of idah’s maintenance, although not in full. This attitude is important to maintain good relations and avoid bab prejudice in the future between husband and wife who have divorced.

References

El Sutha, H. R. D. S. H. (2016). Panduan Muslim Dari Lahir Sampai Mati. Wahyu Qoklbu.

Huda, H. T. (2022, November 13). Observasi [Personal communication].

Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pasal 1 Huruf (f). (n.d.).

Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pasal 80 Ayat (4). (n.d.).

Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pasal 97. (n.d.).

Muhammad, S. bin U. A. (2000). Terjemahan Syarah Ukudullujain (Etika Berumah Tangga ). Pustaka Amani.

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Palangka Raya, Nomor 106/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Plk. (n.d.).

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Palangka Raya, Nomor 295/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Plk. (n.d.).

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Palangka Raya, Nomor 359/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plk. (n.d.).

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Palangka Raya, Nomor 504/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Plk. (n.d.).

Sabiq, S. (2009). Fikih Sunah (4th ed.). Cakrawala Publishing.

Syaikhu dan Munasir. (2016). Pendapat Empat Imam Mazhab Fikih dan Hakim Pengadilaan Agama Kota Palangka Raya. El-Mashlahah, 4, 2–3.

Thalib, M. (2008). Manajemen Keluarga Sakinah. Pro-U.

Undang-Undang No. 1Tahun 1974, Pasal 34 ayat (1). (n.d.).

Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Pasal 35 Ayat 1. (n.d.).

Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Pasal 37. (n.d.).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Iddah Belief Demands that are not Under The Husband’s Capability in Palangka Raya City. (2024). Mir’ah: Family Law and Legal Culture, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.23971/mirah.v1i1.249
Abstract viewed: 168 times
PDF downloaded: 139 times